paul gop

with chris christie iran paul and steveking all angling for position in advance for the 2016 presidential election we have our first ever three-waycatfight here fighting back and forth about not my a number of differentissues and so we've got some videos for you i a dance probably a headache is gonehorse racing but i think there's nothing but fun thoughts are with the the first videothis chris christie talking about rand paul's foreign policy

and it it's pretty insulting just watchi'm love all these eso te rick debates that people aregetting some rampal for example one hissing you can name any number peoplelove over gays in he's one of them i mean these esoteric intellectualdebates i wanted to come to new jersey in sickacross from the widows and the orphans and have thatconversation and and and they won't cuz that's a much tougher conversation ahalf yet so he's hidden in there on hisforeign policy talk in a couple other clips about how

there's this strain of libertarianismgoing to the party right now which i think is kinda dangerous territory from to walk inadvance or my mark on them but specifically there he references the9/11 families and rand paul did not take kindly to that and so he responded to relieve i think kindasad and cheap that he would use that cloak %uh notelect 9/11 victims and say oh i'm the only one who cares aboutthese victims hog wash if he cared about protecting this country

maybe he wouldn't be in this gimme gimmegimme gimme all the money you have in washington or don't have and he'd be a little more fiscallyresponsible and know that the way we defend our country to what we have enough money fornational defense is by being frugal and not by saying gimme gimme gimme allthe time he also called in by the way the keynotebaker yeah i know i think we saw very telling thing they're about the two wings a thesame party because chris christie twice

a day esoteric in a matter have 30 seconds and rampaulsaid hogwash and i think that sorta sums up the esoteric wing and the hot watching i actually thinkone of them is gonna win this it's gonna be rand paul because the heknows he has to get through the primaries right and chris christie keeps shiftingto things that sound more like a democrat that will not get you to see me thatthey screw a rampal the long run in the

general election but i think he's playing the game alittle bit better actually yeah i definitely do think especially on thisparticular issue of like government spying and all that stuff in foreignpolicy rand paul up i wouldn't say wins my votebut definitely gets more support for me than chris christie does i think that the libertarian streak thatpushes for strong national security but less in terms of foreign policy likegoing into other countries make that is actually a great streak and ilove that makes me support libertarian

ideology you get the fiscal policy in you lose meright here but i i like what rand paul has to say aboutforeign policy i don't know if i believe him i don'tknow if he's genuine and overall i think that he's a terribleperson to tell a terrible politician arm but in just on that particular issuei think that he wins over chris yeah it was it was a very weird awkwardquote that he gave right there where he starts of talking about foreign policyany so obviously wants to talk about economic policy instead

it's just being frugal that'll make asafe and everything but so one of the reasons i think rand paul isgoing to have a tough time in the primaries because the new wing and the neo-con wing of theparty is not happy with his lack of intervention sort of approach toforeign policy and so they're already starting to attack him see-saw chris christie their theirclient at each other and steve up to start peter king jumps in and hits a grandpa's well when the issues youmention their about the nsa either

there was absolutely disgraceful that somany republicans voted to defund the a nsa program which is doneso much to protect our country this is aisolationist read this in our party it said goes totally against the party avise an hour in reagan wash opposite where's the realrepublican party why they were gonna find that out over the next three years i with republican party three-party astrong national defense when you are rand paul actuallycomparing snowden sumatra the kangaroo henry david thoreauthis is madness this is the

anti-war left-wing democrats in thenineteen sixties that nominated george mcgovern anddestroy their party from was twenty years and we can have a healthy debate with somany genera candidates not that fringe is like rainfall in the 2016 sorry i think about that why i knowthis will be a bother out here but i'm from long island where peter king is acongressman and i grew up liking this guy he was well-liked in a lotta circles that you know my family is overbut he has gone off the deep end with

yes so there has been a major shift inhim it started around 9/11 which is when it started for a lot of people but now he's really gone off the deepend i'm just so lost retired the fear-mongering and thinking convincing americans to buy into thenotion that we have to give up our rights in order to be protected and as imentioned earlier in the show today obviously the surveillance isn't doingmuch when we had a bombing a few months ago in boston

you see what i'm saying i just it look if your gonna go so far as to collectdata without any warrants okay without any indication that someone is involved in some sorterrors activity then it should yield significant resultsbut the government is not specific with us they keep saying things like well this widespread surveillance ainternet activity i helped us capture 300 tears i'm notthinking behind that i want you to be specific and i want youto elaborate 300 is a very odd number

and very large numbers well very largenumber yeah i love i don't agree with that number and i don't agree with thenumbers they came out when initially the leaks were coming out years ago 1220 fifty people were caught during theinitial testimony i i didn't agree with them but i don't i understand yourfrustration there needs to be reasonable suspicion there needs to bethere needs to be some sort of suspicion free to gather the information i i getas i am disagreeing with you well i'm saying is

any sort of defensive policy is notgonna be foolproof and so simply because something bad happens does not mean thatit didn't ward off i don't like these programs i think theyshould be ended but that's the argument that the the government would give like yet we can have a great defensedoesn't mean we are never ever going to get hit ever and if we do it doesn'tmean that we should cancel the program you know i have you got a great idea ifyou're concerned about terrorist activity and hostility toward the unitedstates how do you stop bombing innocentcivilians how bout you stop doing

signature strikes and double tops because thats exactly the type ofactivity that's causing hostility toward the united states yeah i mean why do you think do youthink people just randomly one attack us because we are like big macs because ourlifestyles know it's because a activity that's happening abroad yeah soif that's what you're really worried about if you want to protect americans and you want to strengthennational security stop killing civilians abrupt